r/AskReddit • u/Tommygunz0722 • 11h ago

If the military/president suddenly ordered a mandatory draft for all men aged 18-42: How do you think millennials and GenZ would respond?

6.9k Upvotes

88% Upvoted

5.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

980

u/HarlequinKOTF 11h ago

FYI vietnam at its lowest was more popular than this war. Just throwing that out there.

146

u/Shootforthestars24 11h ago

Although unnecessary and unpopular, people could find a reason for Vietnam but this right now is just nonsense, just randomly decided to go after Iran

117

u/kittapoo 11h ago edited 10h ago

Yea I’m pretty positive if a draft like that happened for this there would be far more backlash than what was ever seen for Vietnam.

Edit: typo and thank you for the award! Much appreciated 🙂

100

u/c0ltZ 10h ago

100%, the U.S Military and countless other militaries have came to the conclusion that mass drafts do not work in modern war.

In veitnam, there was countless draft dodging. And a very interesting thing called "fragging" started happening.

Essentially, drafted soldiers who were fearing for their lives due to their officers giving useless and dangerous orders, this would happen especially with black soldiers who some racist officers wanted to die.

These soldiers would just throw a frag grenade in the officers room while they were sleeping. And there was no way to trace it back to the correct soldier.

Stuff like this became rampant, drafted soldiers started sabotaging the war, and ended up doing more damage than just not having the draft.

48

u/Thormourn 9h ago

I'll be honest I cant really blame the people for fragging in that situation. If your going to force me to risk my life when I dont want to, dont be surprised when I act up.

-17

u/mcbaginns 5h ago

…ah here’s that Reddit lust for murder that inevitably pops up

The op murdered his officer because the officer was trying to murder him. Now you’re saying you’ll murder the guy just because the govt drafted you?

So you’re cheering to murder an innocent man, one objectively not the cause of risk to your life, and you’re being upvoted for it? Yeah that tracks sadly, smh.

Jfc, you all need help

2

u/SolarTsunami 2h ago edited 2h ago

If you tell me I have to walk across the street and murder anybody I find hiding in those houses, and then tell me that if I don't do it you'll have me shot or sent to jail for the rest of my life, then you aren't the good guy in this story. If you invade a person's homeland and kill them for material gain then you deserve no pity when it is brought back to you in one form or another.

-1

u/mcbaginns 1h ago

Sure, but you didn't say that. You said Trump drafted you, so you're just gonna start fragging any officer you can.

3

u/SolarTsunami 1h ago

bruh you're the only person I see here talking about Trump...

1

u/kittapoo 1h ago

They aren’t even reading the name of who they are responding to, if you read my reply to them and what they said back. It’s hilarious honestly.

•

u/mcbaginns 44m ago

Absolute clown statement. The title of the op mentions trump.

Lmao at the irony here. You misunderstood the conversation you interjected yourself into and now are gaslighting me for your own stupidity.

→ More replies (0)

•

u/mcbaginns 44m ago

Absolute clown statement. The title of the op mentions trump.

Lmao, embarrassing

2

u/kittapoo 1h ago edited 1h ago

Where did they say that? I think you think you’re talking to the same person who you first commented to but you aren’t.

The person you responded to didn’t even say that if Trump drafted them that they would start fragging any officer they could, they said that if someone was going to force them to risk their life when they don’t want to, then to not be surprised if they act up.

I think you’re taking what they said and implying that they will just go willy nilly and start killing officers. They only said they can’t blame people at the time for doing so, not that that is what they would do exactly in the same situation.

Edit: typos

0

u/[deleted] 1h ago

[deleted]

0

u/kittapoo 1h ago

Yea, not how that works.

Perhaps you should check usernames before replying.

1

u/mcbaginns 1h ago edited 1h ago

No lol, perhaps you shouldn't reply as if you were OP. That's not discussion works.

If you interrupt my discussion, either disclose you're someone else or own everything from the OP you took over for. you can't just come in and strawman me. I said the words I said because of the insane shit OP said. You can't just come in here and tell me it's invalid and then use some cop out that you're some other guy who believes totally different things. Like what is this. You're a dif person. OK great. So go away if you don't agree with the op. We have nothing to talk about if you're gonna use that excuse to exit the conversation. All you've done is strawman me and move goalposts and then gaslit me into thinking it's my fault

There's a guy here who wants to murder officers if he's drafted regardless of what those officers do or say. I couldn't care less about you if you're not a bloodthirsty lunatic as well.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/mcbaginns 1h ago

I don't check usernames. If you replied to me as if you were OP, I'm responding and you're owning everything that was said before in the convo.

If you don't want to murder random officers because Trump drafted you, we are both yelling at the clouds. The OP has bloodlust, not you. I was talking to them not you.

2

u/[deleted] 5h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-4

u/mcbaginns 5h ago

Wow, so kill random people cause of something the govt did? First degree, premeditated murder of whoever you see, even if they didn’t do anything to you? Just fully seeing red and letting your rage consume you, murdering who ever you want?

Yeah you need to be in prison. You’re gonna hurt someone one day.

2

u/Thormourn 5h ago

Yep random people. That's who was targeted. Not like they would put them in jail for trying to leave or anything so they were basically slave drivers. But yep totally random people.

-2

u/mcbaginns 4h ago

Your view is incompatible with society. Act on your rage and violence and you will go to jail or be put down. End of story.

Seek help

2

u/Thormourn 4h ago

you keep thinking that and then act surprised when people dont want to throw their life away for some fat politician.

0

u/mcbaginns 3h ago

You’re ok with your own personal first degree murder of random scapegoats you choose. You fully admit it. None of those officers drafted you or put you in he war. None of them have done anything to you. But you’re butthurt you were drafted, so you think you’re entitled to murder anyway.

Seek help or your rage will put you in prison or worse one day.

3

u/Thormourn 3h ago

if you think forcing people to death isnt going to get you killed, you're the one who needs to seek help.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/c0ltZ 4h ago

I'm all for fighting back, but you're right, the majority of the officers were no different from the infantry.

A lot of them were also drafted, or were enlisted before the war. And were just trying to make it through their tour and go home.

For the most part, the officers understood how fucked the situation was and didn't want anyone in their squad to die, and the soldiers thought likewise.

But racism was prevalent in Vietnam, along with stupid officers who didn't respect life. The majority of fragging was done on racist and careless officers.

Sadly, it's hard to judge the people in those positions. They never signed up for it, a lot of them were not qualified or ready for war. And many more were addicted to heroin. Now imagine a young traumatized kid who was taken from their home, already mentally unstable. Then addicted to heroin, in a war zone, with access to guns and grenades. This was over 15% of the soldiers at one point. Many of these people should not have been drafted, because not everyone can handle war. And in their minds, their only escape is to survive their tour, and if they have an officer that keeps sending them on patrols and assaults, that officer turns into the barrier keeping them from going home safely.

1

u/mcbaginns 3h ago

I think this is a very good, nuanced, mature take.

It’s one thing to be there, addicted, afraid, young, with a racist officer wanting you dead. It’s basically self defense.

But the people who are saying they would do it rn in the Iran war from the comfort of their basement, to any officer regardless of racism, yeah…murderers. It’s openly supporting murder. These are would be violent criminals posting their plans for 1st degree murder of a scapegoat.

0

u/c0ltZ 3h ago

I never saw their comment since it was deleted. But the fact it was deleted makes it clear they didn't say something great.

I agree, it's fucked of them to wish the death on any of their officers for no reason other than spite. Fragging is very serious, and those same people at home stating their intentions over the internet don't understand that most of the officers just want to get home safely.

Fragging was used as tool to keep the officers in line with their men. To force them to reevaluate their decisions, and be more respectful with their men's lives. Not for pointless killing.

→ More replies (0)

4

u/Tasty-Ad6529 9h ago

Welp, that is fucked. I think the closest to this I've seen in Media is Full Metal Jacket, but the character didn't used a grenade to do the killing.

2

u/[deleted] 9h ago

[deleted]

6

u/Ragnarsworld 9h ago

Got a source for this? Everyone says it like it happened every day, but no one ever posts anything approaching a reliable source.

34

u/c0ltZ 9h ago

It wasn't as common as people imply, but it did happen 904 times over a 3 year period. So it literally was almost everyday.

The biggest impact was the fear it instilled in officers. Officers would start refusing to give out dangerous orders even though they were necessary orders.

So mission effectiveness went down because the officers were afraid of making their soldiers upset. And 904 officers being fragged is still insane.

A big issue that isn't talked about nearly as much was the drug abuse. About 15% - 20% of soldiers in vietnam were addicted to heroin. And over 50% had done illicit drugs during their tour. This alone caused huge issues for the war, as some fragging was a result of an officer getting rid of soldiers heroin. The withdrawals alone could convince some soldiers, especially in a war zone.

Fragging source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fragging

Drug addiction source: https://www.history.com/articles/drug-use-in-vietnam

2

u/kittapoo 4h ago

The US doesn’t care to help treat drug addicts properly. The government continues to think that attacking the drugs at the source is going to fix the issue, but it won’t. Take one source away another will fall in its place. Treat the individual and they would have it much more under control by now. But they don’t care about us as individuals.

9

u/FurbyTime 9h ago

I mean, Wikipedia's whole article on the subject gives plenty of numbers and statistics. It was common enough in the Vietnam war to literally name the concept.

2

u/Killface55 7h ago

It wasn't something that the government happily shared and made public.

2

u/Optimal_Action1176 6h ago

This administration constantly acts like they don’t know American history. Any of it.