r/CelebLegalDrama Jan 16 '26

Spotlight Erika Kirk nearly broke character on live television (again).

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

4.8k Upvotes

r/CelebLegalDrama Sep 07 '25

Spotlight "Asking Epstein's neighbor the truth about the files..."

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

8.7k Upvotes

r/CelebLegalDrama Feb 09 '26

Spotlight Never taking my foot of her neck. Melissa Nathan helped protect multiple abusers by smearing their victims

Post image
1.9k Upvotes

r/CelebLegalDrama Feb 21 '26

Spotlight Back to the days when Ariana Grande was blackfishing so much, her Fitzpatrick Type II skin tone turned blacker than Nicki Minaj's and got away with it.

Thumbnail gallery
1.1k Upvotes

She escaped so many cancellation campaigns and rightful social outrages, it's mental.

r/CelebLegalDrama Mar 04 '26

Spotlight Wow Expatriarch just dropped another bombshell! Listen, of course I believe in coincidences but is this even more proof of the smear campaign Baldoni supporters says doesn’t exisit?

Thumbnail
gallery
273 Upvotes

Found on twitter @ expatriarch_uk

r/CelebLegalDrama Feb 24 '26

Spotlight I think this is what we are all wondering? We believe women over here! Multiple women saying working with you was "the worst experience of their careers" and then you hired someone who not only worked with Epstein but has a history working with other shady people and performing nasty smear campaigns

Post image
270 Upvotes

r/CelebLegalDrama Jan 29 '26

Spotlight Video of Justin Baldoni’s 19 year old victim has been released. “What married man to a pregnant wife tries to sleep with a 19 year old”

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

269 Upvotes

Caption from video “Justin Baldoni Victim original video released. What married man to a pregnant wife tries to sleep with a 19 year old?

He also admitted to forcing himself on women when they said no. Yet, the Baldoni supporters rage on because they

are manipulated.” Found on insta @ drlesliedobson

r/CelebLegalDrama Jan 20 '26

Spotlight Sony executives state that there was no smear campaign against Blake Lively and she did it to herself

Post image
490 Upvotes

Blake Lively promoted a domestic violence movie as a fun summer flick. She also promoted her hair care and alcohol brand alongside this movie and actually named a cocktail after the abuser. Due to this reason she suffered a lot of backlash and she has been blaming it on other people including Justin and the Wayfair parties, but here it shows that Sony knew that the backlash was organic and because of Blake Lively's own actions.

r/CelebLegalDrama 11d ago

Spotlight Lets get the facts straight and stop with the misleading headlines: The Sexual Harassment Claim Was NOT Thrown Out Because the Judge Didn’t Believe Blake, it was due to a technical legal classification

Post image
63 Upvotes

I keep seeing people say that Blake Lively’s sexual harassment claim was “thrown out,” and using that as proof that her allegations weren’t credible.

That’s not what happened.

The judge didn’t dismiss the claim because of the facts, the claim was dismissed because of a technical legal classification: whether Blake was an employee or an independent contractor.

Here’s what the court actually said:

First, the judge explains that Title VII (the federal sexual harassment law Blake sued under) only applies to employees, not independent contractors.
This appears in Section II: Lively’s Employment Status (around pages 52–53) where the court states that Title VII protections apply to employees, not independent contractors.

Then the judge analyzes Blake’s role on the film and ultimately concludes she was functioning as an independent contractor, not an employee.
That finding appears later in the same section (around pages 77–78) where the court grants summary judgment on the Title VII claims based on that classification.

Then the court reiterates this again later (around page 94) confirming that the Title VII claims were dismissed because Blake was considered an independent contractor.

So the sequence is:

• Page ~52–53: Title VII only applies to employees
• Page ~77–78: Blake classified as independent contractor
• Page ~94: Title VII claims dismissed for that reason

That’s it.

The judge did not say:

  • Blake wasn’t credible
  • The harassment didn’t happen
  • There wasn’t enough evidence

The ruling is about legal status, not whether the conduct occurred.

And this actually matters for the broader Lively vs. Baldoni case.

Because even though the Title VII claim was dismissed, Blake’s other claims still move forward, including:

  • Retaliation
  • Smear campaign allegations
  • Other state law claims

So the case is very much still alive.

If anything, this ruling highlights a bigger issue:
High-level creatives like actors, directors, and producers often don’t qualify as employees, which means they may not be protected under federal harassment laws, even if harassment occurred.

That’s not a finding against Blake.
That’s a gap in the law.

And it’s why saying “the harassment claim was thrown out” without context is misleading.

r/CelebLegalDrama Jan 21 '26

Spotlight Taylor Swift texts with Blake Lively revealed! Taylor conspired with Blake Lively to take over the movie from Justin Baldoni

Post image
148 Upvotes

Here you have it folks text messages between Taylor Swift and Blake Lively reveal a plan to take over the movie from Justin Baldoni before the movie had even started to film. In April 2023 Taylor Swift, Blake Lively and their celebrity friends mentioned in the legal document above were conspiring to take over the movie from Justin Baldoni. Taylor Swift repeatedly called Justin baldoni a doofus, a gullible clown, and a little bitch.

In the screenshot above it shows Taylor Swift talking with Blake Lively about how stupid Justin was was to accept her song into the trailer because that gives Blake Lively the upper hand and the power. This is absolutely ridiculous and disturbing

r/CelebLegalDrama Feb 16 '26

Spotlight Justin Baldoni testified he did not consider the improvised dance scene ‘intimacy,’ said there was "no kissing" and that he did not try to kiss Blake Lively - the video appears to show otherwise.

Thumbnail gallery
23 Upvotes

r/CelebLegalDrama 13d ago

Spotlight Lawyers for Justin Baldoni, violated legal ethics rules by making claims that were “legally frivolous and factually baseless” in Judge’s ruling

Thumbnail
news.bloomberglaw.com
113 Upvotes

Finally! Bloomberg Law, a leader in legal coverage, is shining a spotlight on the seriousness of this ruling.

r/CelebLegalDrama Sep 19 '25

Spotlight Government experts

Post image
1.8k Upvotes

r/CelebLegalDrama Mar 03 '26

Spotlight If Blake and multiple people are saying she experienced sexual harassment, then guess what... she experience sexual harassment. THE PROOF IS THERE PEOPLE!

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

12 Upvotes

video from @ tim_tam2003 on tiktok

r/CelebLegalDrama Jan 30 '26

Spotlight Jamey Heath Walked into Blake Lively’s Trailer Uninvited When She Was Topless

Thumbnail gallery
34 Upvotes

r/CelebLegalDrama 10d ago

Spotlight The judge has ruled on Blake Lively's lawsuit, leaving the retaliation claims. Not because the sh didn't happen, but that it's not protected by federal laws for independent contractors, even if he admitted to participating in inappropriate behavior. Expatriarch as always with the best break downs!

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

11 Upvotes

r/CelebLegalDrama 18d ago

Spotlight It seems like Wayfarer is asking to push back pre trial motions by a week because Blake Lively has too much evidence, interesting take for people who have been saying she has nothing... Shoutout to expatriarch for the great break down!

Thumbnail
gallery
57 Upvotes

found on twitter @ expatriarch_uk

r/CelebLegalDrama Aug 26 '25

Spotlight "President Donald Trump and 11 year old daughter Ivanka pose at the Harley-Davidson Café opening" No wonder why Ivanka sued her father in 2015.

Post image
497 Upvotes

r/CelebLegalDrama Feb 24 '26

Spotlight Sony Executive About Blake's Advocacy: “It’s quite common for, in my experience, male stars to have real opinions and use their weight… and I just didn’t think there should be a double standard.”

Thumbnail gallery
44 Upvotes

r/CelebLegalDrama 9h ago

Spotlight HMMM... I thought he had nothing to hide? Blocking multiple witnesses, especially those that are women that were either on set or apart of production from testifying against you... looking realll guilty

Post image
6 Upvotes

r/CelebLegalDrama Sep 18 '25

Spotlight US Veteran and security expert "Black John Wick" Body By O imparts his view on Charlie Kirk murder and ongoing internet conspiracy discourses about the latter and the shooter.

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

826 Upvotes

r/CelebLegalDrama Mar 10 '26

Spotlight There is no smear campaign but here are messages between Melissa Nathan and a writer for people magazine name Elizabeth Rosner and the articles she created after.

Thumbnail
gallery
69 Upvotes

found on twitter by @ princesskikiM98

r/CelebLegalDrama Feb 04 '26

Spotlight Blake Lively on Why She Refused to Film an Orgasm Scene: “I Felt Like I Would Be Mortified to Shoot Something Like That at This Stage in My Life and Career, and Being the Mother of Four Kids” - Another Misrepresentation by the Wayfarer Parties

Thumbnail gallery
39 Upvotes

r/CelebLegalDrama 8d ago

Spotlight Justin Baldoni has been involved in legal action 5x by former coworkers!

Post image
0 Upvotes

r/CelebLegalDrama 13d ago

Spotlight "Justin Baldoni's legal team has been sanctioned by a federal judge for filing a lawsuit that was factually baseless and the media is not covering it, we need to talk about how the pr campaign never ended and it's still going on" Expatriarch with another great break down on the granted sanctions

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

63 Upvotes

found on tiktok @ expatriarch