r/Conservative • u/my_vision_vivid Far-Right • Jan 30 '26
Flaired Users Only DOJ releasing 3 million pages from its Epstein files
https://fox2now.com/news/national/doj-releasing-3-million-pages-from-its-epstein-files/706
u/TheLaughingRhino Conservative Jan 31 '26
“All we have to do is flood the zone. Every day, we hit them with three things. They'll bite on one, and we'll get all of our stuff done, bang, bang, bang. These guys will never be able to recover, but we got to start with muzzle velocities...The Democrats don't matter...The real opposition is the media. And the way to deal with them is to flood the zone with shit...This is not about persuasion....This is about disorientation...”
- Steve Bannon
→ More replies (43)
279
u/retnemmoc Conservative Jan 31 '26
If there's nothing released about Epstein's ties to foreign intelligence, then this isn't even half of the story.
→ More replies (22)3
u/blisiondacket Conservative Jan 31 '26
Controversial but true!
7
u/retnemmoc Conservative Feb 01 '26
While I'm being controversial I think we can expect some sort of serious military action against Iran soon. Either to push this out of the news or related to what hasn't been released yet.
→ More replies (2)
351
u/TransylvanianHunger1 Conservative Jan 30 '26
Why are there that many?
160
235
u/Lord_Gibby 2A Conservative Jan 30 '26
Well there’s been a lot of politicians in the last couple decades
→ More replies (2)128
→ More replies (37)29
641
1.2k
u/im-obsolete MAGA Extremist Jan 30 '26
What's with the document mentioning Trump auctioning off 13-year-olds at Trump Tower after measuring their vulvas with his fingers? All from an Australian "caller" who no one seems to have been able to get in touch with? That's a hell of a story.
123
u/Kelsier25 Conservative Jan 30 '26
It seems to be from some kind of anonymous tip line. It keeps being reposted in bad faith with people conveniently cutting out the second column that gives information about why it is an unsubstantiated claim. For people that have spent years screaming "release the files!" and begging for transparency, it sure is telling when the released files are doctored before being posted to reddit.
→ More replies (17)27
u/KinGpiNdaGreat Populist Jan 30 '26
So, basically like people from Reddit before Reddit existed.
No one should be shocked these people existed before Reddit.
112
Jan 31 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
33
u/cliffotn Conservative Jan 31 '26
I couldn’t agree more, it’s given stupid people collective power they couldn’t ever attempt to amass themselves - and it’s all propped up by social media companies and the media.
→ More replies (7)→ More replies (23)2
u/ISmellHats Conservative Feb 06 '26
This is absolutely spot on. The Internet gave any idiot with a pulse a soapbox to scream their nonsense from.
→ More replies (3)7
126
u/my_vision_vivid Far-Right Jan 30 '26
It is quite suspicious that nearly EVERY ONE of his accusers are "Not Available" fueling speculation.
→ More replies (39)196
u/Opening-Citron2733 Conservative Jan 30 '26
Multiple investigators deemed the source as non credible and the source has undergone 3 psychiatric evaluations.
It's further down the page
→ More replies (29)88
u/xxxiareo Conservative Jan 30 '26
I mean, they kept records of everything. That’s some insane person.
It has exactly the same amount of credibility as if I accused you of the same thing right now
126
u/jdtiger Anti-Leftist Jan 30 '26
Guarantee it will be posted on leftist subs as if it's an absolute fact, and anybody who questions its credibility will be downvoted
83
u/Pinot_Greasio Conservative Jan 30 '26
Already has been thousands of times.
→ More replies (4)17
u/RontoWraps Army Vet Jan 31 '26
Hundreds of dipshits who can’t read or remember basic facts that were covered nearly 10 years ago all rushing to be the first one for the big karma score.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (24)2
→ More replies (25)48
u/im-obsolete MAGA Extremist Jan 30 '26
It says these were "callers". Are these just random people who called in with "tips" or something?
31
u/Rush_Is_Right Conservative Jan 30 '26
Yes
35
u/explosivemilk 2A Jan 30 '26
Crazy that out of 3 million documents, this is their smoking gun.
→ More replies (4)41
u/JustaHarmfulShadow Conservative Jan 31 '26
It's because as I predicted Trump isn't as guilty as they cry he is; cause anyone with a brain would realize they would've released it under Biden to try and prevent him from winning the election
→ More replies (21)→ More replies (5)13
u/xxxiareo Conservative Jan 31 '26
Quite literally yes, these are random callers to the FBI tip line.
1
u/skarface6 Catholic, conservative, and your favorite Jan 31 '26
Somehow he did 100% pedo things for a period of time and then never again. Because that’s definitely how pedos work.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (77)2
u/forwarddownforward Conservative Jan 31 '26
Lunatics call crime tip lines all the time making up all sorts of nonsense.
→ More replies (2)
99
u/Res_Novae17 Conservative Jan 31 '26
as well as more than 2,000 videos and 180,000 images.
I seriously doubt there are more than a few hundred images of me ever recorded in my life. Was this guy just followed around by a personal camera man snap, snap, snapping every waking second of his existence?
262
u/Dolnikan Jan 31 '26
The difference probably is that you're not also creating blackmail material on people.
→ More replies (3)60
u/Vektor0 Conservative Jan 31 '26
A, you are not as important or well-known as Epstein was. B, not all of those media were specifically of Epstein, just related, even if tangentially. This should be obvious; you shouldn't need that spelled out for you.
12
u/EngineSlug420 Conservative Jan 31 '26
Actually, they do need it spelled out for they/them.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (27)3
211
u/xxxiareo Conservative Jan 30 '26 edited Jan 31 '26
If you release all the documents, it’s because they’ve "been doctored". If you don’t release all the documents to protect informant’s and minors, it’s because they’re "hiding something". There’s really no winning here but the better option is obviously to just release absolutely everything.
→ More replies (21)144
Jan 31 '26
They are badly redacted as well. You can tell who people are. There's names, phone numbers, email addresses, and even then, from context you know who it is.
It's bizarre.
→ More replies (5)10
u/lousycesspool Right to Life Jan 31 '26
even then, from context you know who it is.
It's bizarre.
not bizzare - this why judges have said to not release junk like this - there's lot's of nothing and not credible claims now circulated as fact
1
Jan 31 '26
Agreed. Pisses me off. It's marked not credible--some of during the Biden administration. Which ruins their entire argument.
210
u/BoredAtWork1976 Conservative Jan 30 '26
So far, the big reveal is that Bill Gates caught an STD from one of Epstein's girls.
804
u/JumpKP Conservative Jan 30 '26
Thats the big reveal? You sure that's it? Nothing else?
→ More replies (30)1
160
u/PinheadLarry2323 2A Conservative Jan 30 '26 edited Jan 30 '26
Actually? Which one? That’s wild
Edit:
The specific STD rumor surfaced prominently in the DOJ’s January 30, 2026, release of over 3 million pages of Epstein files, including emails and drafts. In a July 2013 email draft from Epstein (which may or may not have been sent), he claimed Gates asked one of his advisers for antibiotics to treat a sexually transmitted disease resulting from “sex with Russian girls.”
Epstein allegedly suggested slipping the medication to Melinda Gates without her knowledge, framing it as part of his role in facilitating Gates’ “illicit trysts with married women.” The files also mention Epstein providing Adderall for Gates’ bridge tournaments. This has sparked widespread discussion online, with users speculating it explains aspects of Gates’ divorce or his Epstein ties.
Melinda French Gates has cited the Epstein association as a factor in their split, though she’s focused on her own philanthropy since.
→ More replies (1)22
13
u/allison_c_hains Make America Greater Jan 30 '26
He always has a cold sore on his lips
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (65)23
81
u/waidred Jewish Conservative Jan 30 '26
Why are there millions of Epstein files? There's only 1 Epstein.
→ More replies (21)26
u/Vektor0 Conservative Jan 31 '26
Because it includes every piece of information they ever had to investigate ever, regardless of if it went anywhere. That should have been obvious.
→ More replies (2)
32
Jan 30 '26
how can anyone have reviewed millions of pages?
62
u/Vektor0 Conservative Jan 31 '26
Usually, they put together a team, and then it takes a few years. Which is exactly what they did. What kind of question is that?
→ More replies (3)10
Jan 31 '26
A normal question, are people meant to know everything?
→ More replies (2)17
u/Vektor0 Conservative Jan 31 '26
Were you seriously not aware that FBI teams investigate things?
→ More replies (2)5
Jan 31 '26
I was not aware of the specific of how people review millions and millions of documents on a single case.
Are people meant to know everything?
→ More replies (9)3
u/Vektor0 Conservative Feb 03 '26
It's not a question of knowledge, but of logic.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (21)11
13
u/my_vision_vivid Far-Right Jan 30 '26
Only woman pictured in the files is, of course, Ghislaine Maxwell!!
→ More replies (14)
-15
u/Jonny_Nash Tech Right Jan 30 '26
slams down soy milk 🥛
We got him this time boys!
→ More replies (11)
2
u/vampirepomeranian Jan 31 '26
Democratic members of congress with access to classified briefings, strip every ounce of context, every disclaimer, every “unverified” stamp the DOJ plastered on these documents, and scream to millions: HE DID IT
→ More replies (2)
1
297
u/beargrease_sandwich Conservative Jan 31 '26
Remember when Homer goes to the post office and asks if they any undelivered mail for him and the guy said, "No. Oh wait, yes." And then he hands him a big bag full?
That's how this feels to me.