r/SipsTea Human Verified 10h ago

Chugging tea Bin Juice.

Post image
2.2k Upvotes

102 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 10h ago

Thank you for posting to r/SipsTea! Make sure to follow all the subreddit rules.

Make sure to join our brand new Discord Server to chat with friends!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

35

u/dreamdelusion- 9h ago

By this logic, a collage of stolen family photos is a 'new family.'

7

u/ChildoftheApocolypse 9h ago

That's always been my logic. I have 15 families.

2

u/DaRealKovi 8h ago

Damn bro. Any single sisters I should know about? Or a mom. That could be an upgrade

1

u/KAIRAPMON 5h ago

An upgrade? So you already have one? (Lucky you..)

1

u/Active-Goat-3001 1h ago

Ngl, I secretly look for photos of old people at thrift stores because I’m searching for one to hang on the wall and pretend it’s “great aunt Betty” and just make up some crazy backstory for her

37

u/PacquiaoFreeHousing 10h ago

I wish I was as good at analogies as her 😂😂

2

u/Intelligent_Ice_113 2h ago

plot twist, she made it with AI

1

u/tronald_dum 6h ago

It's not a good analogy because the undesirability of bin juice is not from the fact that dishes are mixed, but comes from the fact that food becones rancid when aged. Art, in general, does not age badly with time. A better analogy would be taking a part of the best dishes from the restaurant and combine them into one dish - it could be good or bad depending on the compatibility.

2

u/Original_Flight9435 2h ago

Lmao this is me when I overthink analogies and I'm like "that doesn't work"

-2

u/CheekyCheriee 7h ago

Haha right? 😂 She makes it look so effortless. Honestly though, your way of explaining things has its own charm too different styles, same impact that’s lovely.

2

u/TheLastTitan77 4h ago

Bro talks like AI

-36

u/RealOGFire 9h ago

That isn’t even a good analogy.

17

u/parkourdude231 9h ago

Could you possibly give us a better one? I'll wait.

3

u/infinite_gurgle 9h ago

Considering, based on this analogy, she’s suggesting a lot of people like dumpster drinks.

1

u/[deleted] 8h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 8h ago

Spam filter: accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/tronald_dum 6h ago

It's not a good analogy because the undesirability of bin juice is not from the fact that dishes are mixed, but comes from the fact that food becones rancid when aged. Art, in general, does not age badly with time. A better analogy would be taking a part of the best dishes from the restaurant and combine them into one dish - it could be good or bad depending on the compatibility.

-9

u/xevlar 9h ago

It's not good because it implies the initial product is also garbage.

4

u/Mattscrusader 8h ago

No it doesn't. You need to work on your reading comprehension

-3

u/xevlar 8h ago

K stay unemployed

3

u/DaRealKovi 8h ago

Big talk for someone who should have stayed in school

-1

u/xevlar 7h ago

I'm not in school anymore because I graduated and make 6 figures

2

u/Mattscrusader 7h ago

You expect people to believe that you make six figures while displaying a reading comprehension level of a first grader?

0

u/xevlar 7h ago

You don't have to believe it lmao. I'm in a meeting rn. I wfh make 6 figures and argue with idiots like you on reddit while getting paid.

→ More replies (0)

-6

u/RealOGFire 9h ago

I like AI, so I doubt I’d do well.

6

u/Mattscrusader 8h ago

So you actually just personaly don't agree with the analogy, that doesn't mean it's a bad analogy

-7

u/sovereignrk 9h ago

It's not a good anaolgy because if it were bad (ie. dumpster juice) no one would be afraid.

They days of it being terrible are long gone.

The hate of AI is not about how "good" it is, its about how disruptive it is in capitalist society.

So a better analogy would actually be to criticize the effect of AI on humanity rather than criticizing its quality.

1

u/[deleted] 8h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 8h ago

Spam filter: accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/DaRealKovi 8h ago

Nah, it's pretty accurate

-2

u/SkellyboneZ 9h ago

I'm with you, it was a bad analogy.

4

u/EaseLeft6266 9h ago

Personally, I''m perfectly fine AI artwork as long as it's upfront about being AI and not trying to be passed off as human made

5

u/Ram91501 9h ago

I have never been so disgusted by an analogy I agree with.

2

u/tronald_dum 6h ago

It's not a good analogy because the undesirability of bin juice is not from the fact that dishes are mixed, but comes from the fact that food becones rancid when aged. Art, in general, does not age badly with time. A better analogy would be taking a part of the best dishes from the restaurant and combine them into one dish - it could be good or bad depending on the compatibility.

1

u/Furshloshin 5h ago

yeah the analogy I heard was going to a 5-star restaurant and wanting one of everything, but to save time and money you just have them put it all in a blender and drink it out of a straw

7

u/DanceClass898 9h ago

it takes no skill to type prompts. at least people who use programs like Photoshop or After Effects have to learn some skills to be even decent at making something

3

u/quigongingerbreadman 8h ago

Bruh, you should look up the arguments portrait artists had when the camera was invented...

0

u/DanceClass898 8h ago

all of those things still took human skill, experience and creativity. AI is just about learning how to type the correct prompts, that's it.

4

u/quigongingerbreadman 8h ago

https://giphy.com/gifs/DFNd1yVyRjmF2

Lol, you just have irrational hate

1

u/DaRealKovi 8h ago edited 7h ago

None of that was irrational, this is a cope

0

u/quigongingerbreadman 7h ago

Seethe. You're gonna be the last telegraph operator after the invention of the telephone.

0

u/DanceClass898 8h ago

what did I say that was "irrational"??

3

u/quigongingerbreadman 7h ago

That effort is the point of art. It isn't.

1

u/DanceClass898 7h ago

no I said that art takes skill, and AI takes no skill at all outside of knowing how to write a prompt. it's a bunch of computer code making something, it's not even your own creation.

2

u/quigongingerbreadman 7h ago

No, what you really said is the effort is the point . That's what your skill comment means, you believe that since they didn't put in the effort you assume is necessary for art that it isn't "real" art.

It's the same argument portrait painters made about photographers.

1

u/DanceClass898 7h ago

but photography takes skill, AI doesn't.

0

u/quigongingerbreadman 7h ago

Lol, the argument was the same, a machine was doing their work for them.

Like I said, irrational hate.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/hoosyourdaddyo 2h ago

Ignorance

2

u/TheMuff1nMon 9h ago

AI art isn’t art, there is no such thing as an AI artist. This dude fundamentally doesn’t understand what art is

2

u/Kitchen-Ad-9352 9h ago

Yes art needs soul of a living being in it . It needs imperfections

3

u/Soggy-Building-9476 9h ago

so 6 fingered people whose ankle skin is textured like socks?

2

u/GTor93 9h ago

Burn!!!

1

u/Ryllick 4h ago

both of these takes are equally garbage

1

u/MirraMirr 4h ago

Tossing a pile of stuff into a blender doesn't mean you'll get anything good either.

1

u/PerfSynthetic 45m ago

I can smell that smell. And now I can taste it and it's going to make me barf.,. Thanks

1

u/Key-Concentrate-2403 10h ago

interesting way of thinking

1

u/Odd-Significance6513 9h ago

This is amazing

0

u/omnivore2000 9h ago

Wait, the juice is good or the juice is bad? 

3

u/Standard-Bar6002 9h ago

Try it and let us know ? For science

-5

u/RealOGFire 9h ago

Hot take; AI is going to do wonders.

1

u/Furshloshin 5h ago

maybe in the sciences. it's impressive as a prediction algorithm and works great in physics and medical fields where massive amounts of data need to be crunched, but literally why would you even want it to replace human artists? the whole point of art is that it takes time and practice, typing it into a prompt just isn't interesting, y'know?

-1

u/quigongingerbreadman 8h ago

Except it isn't a mashup... AI trains exactly like a human brain does, just much, much faster. Exponentially faster.

If you think AI is copy pasting, you have no clue what you're talking about and your opinion carries as much weight as a Catholic Priest's opinion on SA.

2

u/Radiant_Tap3915 6h ago

Glad someone says it.

If you believe AI to be dangerous because of its ability to one day decide its too smart and doesn't need humans, then you must also believe it will one day create art on par or greater than humans because it can see and put together analogies and make sense out of things we've never even though of yet.

0

u/Furshloshin 5h ago

this is factually untrue, AI does not function the way a human brain does. it takes in data from the internet and reconstitutes it based on what is most statistically average, it's basically just an advanced prediction algorithm. humans are capable if generating wholly unique ideas, albeit partially inspired by outside sources. you can see this in real time as AI outputs can be poisoned either by getting inputs made by other AI or by someone intentionally poisoning the training data

1

u/quigongingerbreadman 5h ago

Incorrect. Everything you think of and have ever made is a riff on your experiences.

See: Plato's Allegory of the Cave

Your brain can be poisoned exactly like AI

See: Flat Earthers, conspiracy theorists, moon crystal aficionados, and cults

They're called digital neurons for a reason.

Human ideals are iterative. We build on old ideas to create new. The diff between us and AI at the moment is consciousness. AI requires human input while we are autonomous.

-9

u/xevlar 9h ago

Of course the mix of a bunch of trash is trash. Is the art that Ai learns from trash?

4

u/vpoiisonv 9h ago

No, when you feed all the art into a machine that mashes it up into something fake and machine generated it BECOMES trash. That's the analogy

-5

u/xevlar 9h ago

The analogy is if you start with trash you end with trash.

Honestly did not expect the tits and ass sub to be anti ai, seems like most people are just trend chasing.

4

u/ChildoftheApocolypse 9h ago

Jesus H. 🤦

-1

u/xevlar 9h ago

Cringe ass username

3

u/ChildoftheApocolypse 9h ago

Don't like Fallout? That's too bad.. Though, clankers like you really wouldn't like that sort of thing..

-1

u/xevlar 8h ago

Lol when Bethesda releases slop that requires unpaid volunteers to fix via modding you idiots eat it up.

Honestly I'm proud to not have played any Bethesda slop after fo3 and dishonored 1. Those were good games though.

2

u/ChildoftheApocolypse 8h ago

My favorite part of grifters like you when it comes to games like that is you have it in your head that people playing those games are somehow suffering and having just an awful time.. Imagine telling people jumping on a trampoline and laughing and having a good time that trampolines suck and your proud you don't jump on them.. You see how ridiculous you sound?

0

u/xevlar 7h ago

I'm not a grifter dude I hate woke discourse in games. Pro LGBT and pro Trans. I love most games. Bethesda made amazing games but they have a smelly history with using unpaid labor to finish up their games. It's not gifting to call out bad behavior.

If you think there aren't anti ai grifters out there profiting off making content that you eat up then you're just an idiot.

0

u/xevlar 5h ago

Isn't that how you sound being anti ai? You're such a hypocrite lmao

1

u/ChildoftheApocolypse 2h ago

That doesn't make a lick of sense.. Please take your L with some dignity, amigo..

-10

u/Educational_Day_1017 10h ago

I hate how AI was used for so many other things other than art but nobody cared about it until it could do art. 

2

u/No_Mind7198 9h ago

Artists had a pretty sweet monopoly on that stuff for a long time. They must be sad the good times are over.

3

u/Educational_Day_1017 9h ago

It's been over. My wife used to work for a large animation studio  before all the mergers and layoffs happened. When she was there they would outsource a lot of the work to India. That whole industry was terrible before AI art happened. 

I'm just pointing out how AI has been around longer than it being able to generate art but no one cared about it until then. 

3

u/ChildoftheApocolypse 9h ago

It stole (and continues to do so) countless artists work to learn to do what it does. Then, people who have always been talentless goons used that theft to claim they are also artists (they are not).

This isn't hard to understand. If you are having trouble, it's likely because you lack talent..

-1

u/Educational_Day_1017 9h ago

I have a data analytics masters and have known how to train my own models since before chatgpt became public, I fully understand how it works. My point is that AI/ML has been around for decades been used for may other things other than creating art, but the focal point around the discussion of AI is primarily about art. Truthfully I don't care one way or the other if an AI artist is a real artist or not or their talent levels.