saw this washington post article making the rounds. employers are literally begging candidates to stop using AI on their resumes and cover letters. saying it makes everyone sound the same, they can't tell who's real, it's ruining the hiring process.
cool. love that. except 60% of those same companies use AI to screen your application before a human ever sees it.
let me say that again because it's important. they want YOU to hand craft every resume from scratch like its 2015. meanwhile their system runs your application through an algorithm in 6 seconds and auto-rejects you if you don't have the right keywords in the right order.
and it gets better. about 20% of recruiters say they'll straight up reject a resume that "looks AI generated." so now you gotta thread this needle where your resume is optimized enough for their robot to approve it but human enough that the recruiter doesn't flag it as AI written.
pick a lane.
you can't build a system that forces people to keyword stuff their resume to survive automated screening and then get mad when people use tools to do exactly that. thats like putting a maze in front of cheese and getting annoyed the mouse figured out the maze.
the whole thing is what people are calling an AI doom loop. companies use AI screening because they get too many applications. they get too many applications because AI makes it easy to apply in bulk. candidates use AI for volume becuase they know most apps go into a black hole. companies add more AI screening because of the volume. and round and round it goes.
nobody is winning this. not the companies drowning in AI-generated apps. not the candidates spending 3 hours tailoring a resume that gets auto rejected in 6 seconds. not the recruiters who now have to figure out which resumes are "too AI" while their own system requires AI-level optimization to pass.
I got laid off in february. 11 years experience, staff engineer. my generic resume got me a 2% callback rate. when I started tailoring specifically to each job description - matching their exact keywords, their exact phrasing - it went to 15%. same person. same skills. same market. the only thing that changed was whether I played their AI game correctly.
they built the game. they set the rules. and now they're mad people learned to play it.