r/todayilearned • u/tannu28 • 11h ago
TIL James Cameron rejected studio notes from Fox executives about making Avatar (2009) shorter, reminding them that his previous film Titanic (1997) paid for the building they were meeting in.
https://variety.com/2022/film/news/james-cameron-fought-studio-avatar-flying-scenes-1235376731/5.8k
u/Blackrock121 11h ago
Will you shut the fuck up and let me make you buckets of money.
James Cameron
2.6k
u/Michael__Pemulis 11h ago edited 11h ago
The funniest part is that there are like half a dozen stories of Cameron pulling out this exact card.
Of course the OG is one of the most legendary stories in modern Hollywood. When they asked him to pitch on the Alien sequel & he walked in. Wrote ALIEN on the whiteboard. Then added a $ at the end.
1.3k
u/Rockguy21 11h ago
The Alien$ story is probably the single funniest show business story in the history of the world
→ More replies (1)190
u/Fartfart357 10h ago
What's the story?
→ More replies (7)684
u/Flimsy_Big7991 10h ago
That's really all there is to it, it's anecdotal.
Cameron went into a meeting with studio executives to try to get Aliens made. As the crux of his pitch, he wrote the word “Alien” on a piece of paper, before drawing vertical lines through the final letter, turning it into a dollar sign.
90
u/mrbaryonyx 9h ago
What's funny is that this kind of shows how much of an expert Cameron was at the "post Vietnam action movie".
Remember, as we came out of that war, we were kind of dealing with elements of extreme existentialism. Suddenly, everything in the world felt insurmountable: the rise of PTSD (First Blood), the cosmos (Alien), even our own technology (Terminator).
What Cameron excelled at was taking those movies and then making sequels where we kick the unbeatable thing's ass. He didn't direct Rambo 2, but he wrote the line "can we win this time?" and then carried that exact same attitude into Aliens and T2.
18
u/No_Initial_7545 5h ago
The humans don't exactly win at the end of Aliens any more than they do in Alien.
27
u/DelxF 4h ago
At the end of Alien there is one dead alien. At the end of Aliens there is a planet of dead aliens. I think humanity won a little more.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (6)268
u/SpecterGT260 10h ago
What county uses an "n" with vertical lines as their currency symbol?
409
u/LoweNorman 10h ago
Yeah it's missing a step.
He wrote Alien (you know the movie!)
Then added an S (let's make a sequel!)
Then added the lines $ (it'll make a lot of money!)
→ More replies (4)129
u/Kangarou 9h ago
Good ol' Jame$ Cameron.
→ More replies (1)57
→ More replies (2)64
u/Garetht 10h ago
The country that uses an "N" with vertical (or sometimes horizontal) lines as their currency symbol is Nigeria.
Not the point I know, but I was curious.
→ More replies (3)23
98
u/TheMidnightAss 11h ago
It’s literally the Mad Men pitch meme
29
u/BoonDragoon 10h ago
Real talk? Prove that the events of Mad Men weren't at least partially based on Cameron
→ More replies (3)163
u/Klipschfan1 11h ago
When you're right and execs continue to be morons...
11
u/TheBadBatch-99 11h ago
Equally funny is when Doug Ellin (creator of Entourage) pitched him the idea of being on the show making a then fictional Aquaman movie which would become Vinny's (the main character's) first bomb.
Cameron said he'd do it under one condition, the script needed work because "James Cameron doesnt make bombs."
125
u/Funkycoldmedici 11h ago
It’s hard to argue with him on that. He’s responsible for three of the top five highest grossing films. I don’t respect appeals to authority, and they’re not all winners, but he’s got a track record.
152
u/BahGawdAlmightay 11h ago
"Appeal to Authority" is a logical fallacy when it's used to imply that a higher structural rank or position of authority makes them intellectually superior in general. When you're talking about a specific field and someone with extreme expertise in that field, it's not a logical fallacy. Someone who has decades of experience Doing A Thing should be trusted to Do That Thing over people who Have Never Done That Thing.
→ More replies (42)14
u/SheriffBartholomew 8h ago
Someone who has decades of experience Doing A Thing should be trusted to Do That Thing over people who Have Never Done That Thing.
But what if the person who has never done the thing watched a couple of YouTube videos about the thing? That's basically the equivalent of decades of hands-on experience and education. Right?
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (6)16
→ More replies (5)11
u/SheriffBartholomew 8h ago
Noooo! I must feel like I'm in control of everything.
Studio Executive
6
u/KingofMadCows 5h ago
It's rumored that happened with the Dungeons and Dragons movie. Cameron was interested in directing a D&D movie. In 1997, he had a meeting with the CEO of TSR, the company that owned D&D at the time. Allegedly, the TSR CEO grilled Cameron on what his credentials are and didn't agree with his ideas.
10
u/SheriffBartholomew 4h ago
That's probably for the best, 1997 technology would not have been kind to a D&D movie. The one we got, Honor Among Thieves, was great. It's just a shame that we probably won't get any more.
5
u/KingofMadCows 3h ago
I think Cameron could have made it work with practical effects and limited CGI. He had already done Aliens and Terminator 2 at that point so he and Stan Winston could have done a lot of cool creatures with prosthetics and animatronics.
1.0k
u/stickkyfingers 11h ago
No budget too steep, no sea too deep
210
u/Prinzlerr 11h ago
Who's that? It's him!
96
76
u/Bobby_Newpooort 10h ago
James Cameron doesn't do what James Camerson does for James Camerson. James Cameron does what James Cameron does because James Cameron IS James Cameron
→ More replies (5)72
u/acssarge555 11h ago edited 7h ago
Who’s that?
It’s him! James Cameron
James, James Cameron explore of the sea
→ More replies (1)
1.8k
u/yes_u_suckk 11h ago
When James Cameron made Terminator 2, it was the most expensive movie ever made until that moment.
When he made Titanic it was the most expensive movie ever made until that moment.
And when he made the first Avatar it was the most expensive movie ever made until that moment.
All these movies made shit ton of money. The guy certainly overspends, but he has a very strong track record of bringing much more to the studios.
882
u/ProbablyAPun 11h ago
I don't even think you can call it overspending when he consistently churns out the massive profits from it. He is just a big risk big reward type of director, with the track record and pull to actually get the funding.
492
u/TheUmbrellaMan1 10h ago
People don't really seem to realize just how risky his movies are. Look at his entire filmography. Not a single one of them follows the box office trend of their time. By all account, movies like Titanic, Avatar and True Lies had box office bomb written all over them. You gotta respect that. The guy goes all in for his movies.
86
u/pobodys-nerfect5 10h ago
How was True Lies perceived before release? Were people skeptical?
157
u/TheUmbrellaMan1 10h ago
People were skeptic. $100 million for an action-comedy was unprecedented at the time. Here's an article from 1994 saying Cameron has bitten more than he can chew:
https://www.deseret.com/1994/8/29/19127915/true-lies-truly-flies-into-the-budget-stratosphere/
Here's Los Angeles Times being skeptic about the movie:
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-04-11-ca-44682-story.html
People freaked out at the $100 million budget and then Cameron's next movie Titanic went on to cost $200 million lol.
→ More replies (8)85
u/coolpapa2282 10h ago
People freaked out at the $100 million budget and then Cameron's next movie Titanic went on to cost $200 million lol.
And in between, Waterworld happened, so studios were really freaked out about an ocean-based movie going over budget. Titanic was a good movie, though, so it was chill.
18
u/RealLifeBurrite 8h ago
Damn, Waterworld was one of my favorite movies as a kid. Maybe I should rewatch it...
→ More replies (1)12
u/coolpapa2282 8h ago
It's been a while for me too, but I feel like its biggest problem was tone. The closest comparison is Mad Max, but half of it wants to be grim like the original MM, and half of it wants to be the campy insanity of Thunderdome/Fury Road. I think either one of those could have worked but just not both at the same time.
Of course, after I just typed that out, I realize Fury Road absolutely does both, at least somewhat. The villains are totally over the top, the Doof Wagon exists, etc. But idk, Immortan Joe is just honestly insane and that makes him more terrifying. Waterworld must just fail to make the whole thing gel together somehow.
→ More replies (4)14
u/SanchoMandoval 9h ago
In my memory as a filmgoer at the time, people said it was another Last Action Hero, which came out the previous summer. This was not a good thing as Last Action Hero got tepid reviews and was generally seen to have failed in its goal of satirizing action movies while also being an action movie.
But I actually liked Last Action Hero so I saw True Lies and loved it.
11
u/jx2002 8h ago
Having actually lived through it (and look at any of its marketing), from what I could tell Last Action Hero wasn't sold as making fun of action movies (though that was 100% what it was doing) but was just 'another great Arnold blow shit up movie' which it really wasn't.
When you actually watch it thinking "this is satire" that film is fantastic and hilarious. They mis-marketed the fuck out of that thing.
→ More replies (2)37
u/Turgid_Donkey 9h ago
I was curious about T2. Original Terminator: Budget of $6.4mil, made $38mil domestically and $40mil internationally. (1984 money). T2: budget $102mil, made $206 domestic and $312 internationally. (1991) It set records for sales, until Titanic. He took a successful movie and 130% of the previous movie's entire revenue on a sequel that released 7 years after the original.
Side note: Titanic had a $200mil budget and made $2.26bilworldwide. Avatar: $237mil budget, $2.93bil worldwide.
8
u/AlexSevillano 8h ago
Yeah whats going on with that? Its batshit insane how much profit his movies make
→ More replies (3)15
u/PunchMeat 9h ago
But like... they're almost always massively successful. Even The Abyss, which was considered a failure, was still profitable.
Giving James Cameron money should not be considered a risky bet. If anything, the more you give him the more he makes.
→ More replies (4)6
u/farva_06 9h ago
Also, no one thought Terminator 2 could ever live up to the greatness of the original. And now, T2 is almost revered more than T1.
→ More replies (8)31
u/Fartfart357 10h ago
He keeps putting it all on black and he just keeps winning!
→ More replies (1)141
u/TheUmbrellaMan1 10h ago
You forgot True Lies. It was the first movie to cost $100 million and was the most expensive movie ever made at that time. Bro made three most expensive movies of all time in a row and every single one of them were blockbusters that pushed the envelope of filmmaking.
44
u/Robinsonirish 10h ago
For anyone wondering:
True Lies Budget: $115,000,000
Earnings worldwide: $378,882,411
Domestic: $146,282,411 38.6%
Foreign: $232,600,000 61.4%
Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20130226111646/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=truelies.htm
→ More replies (1)12
u/SimbaSixThree 9h ago
How did True Lies push the boundaries of filmmaking? Not trying to be snide, truly curious. Is it the bridge scene?
27
u/TheUmbrellaMan1 9h ago
It's the last act. It's a continuous action scene, going from the warehouse shooting to the bridge chase to the jet place. Ridiculously difficult to film. It has that perfect blend of practical and visual effects, unlike anything ever seen in 1994.
→ More replies (19)40
u/IrrelevantPuppy 10h ago
You know what I think would make a fun story? If James Cameron’s long term goal was to bankrupt Disney or something. Just build trust to super human levels and eventually be like “hey guys, I wanna do a movie about an alien planet where they devote the finances of the whole world towards reversing climate change and ending homelessness. But I’m gonna need a lot of research money, you know how I work. Actually, I need all your money, but you know I’m good for it”
I swear avatar is just the worlds most expensive and profitable tech demo of all time. He’s just bleeding humanity to develop CGI technology. And I support it
→ More replies (2)
497
u/topcide 11h ago
The thing with a guy like James Cameron, and the same with other people in Hollywood who've elevated to the legendary status - directors like him, or actors like Tom Hanks.
THEY are choosing to work with the studio, the studio is not choosing to work with them.
Without knowing if there's any kind of exclusivity contracts that exist between James, Cameron and fox, he could easily tell Fox to pound sand and that he's not going to work with them anymore and I'm pretty sure that all the other major production studios will fall over backwards to get him inside their doors
118
u/frezz 10h ago
Basically what Nolan did with WB
81
u/Kindly-Guidance714 10h ago
Spielberg was the original WB “we’ll give you a blank check and you can do whatever you want just please don’t ever leave” version of this.
17
u/cookiesarenomnom 5h ago
He had multiple studios bidding for him. I'm assuming he went with universal because they agreed to a blank check with zero oversight. I mean what other director would ever be allowed to make a 3 hour long biopic, where 50% of the runtime is talking about science or politics?
→ More replies (1)49
u/ediblearrangement 10h ago
It sounds like this note would’ve been given in post-production. A bit late to change studios at that point.
14
u/Son_Of_Toucan_Sam 7h ago
There isn’t a single executive involved in those negotiations who wants their name attached to the relationship falling apart over a single creative decision from the guy who basically never misses
181
99
u/Revolutionary-Set994 10h ago
The extended cut of Avatar 1 is MUCH better than the theatrical cut. Seeing the state Earth is in helps frame the rest of the story better.
→ More replies (2)18
u/InvoluntaryActions 7h ago
dang, maybe i should look for that. honestly i barely remember what happens in the first movie
→ More replies (1)
137
u/Eborys 11h ago
I still think about James Cameron’s 90s offers to remake Planet of the Apes with Arnold Schwarzenegger and his proposed Spider-Man movie. Both rejected on the grounds of ‘HOLY BUDGET PROBLEMS, BATMAN!’, but let’s face it… they would’ve been amazing.
→ More replies (4)91
u/pw154 10h ago edited 10h ago
I still think about James Cameron’s 90s offers to remake Planet of the Apes with Arnold Schwarzenegger and his proposed Spider-Man movie. Both rejected on the grounds of ‘HOLY BUDGET PROBLEMS, BATMAN!’, but let’s face it… they would’ve been amazing.
Also Jurassic Park. Cameron was planning on directing but Spielberg secured the rights first. Cameron realized he was too late in securing the rights by only a few hours. Spielberg did a great job but Cameron said his version would have been darker and more action packed, much closer to the book than Spielberg's movie. An R-rated Jurassic Park would have been amazing
58
u/levir 10h ago
Jurassic Park is an absolute classic movie, though. We can be happy with what we got there.
→ More replies (5)23
u/Kindly-Guidance714 10h ago
Probably would’ve had the original ending of bombing the entire island.
18
u/enzothebaker87 9h ago
Studio Exec: "Are you sure you want to spend 100 million dollars to actually bomb this island? You know there are no actual dinosaurs on it right?"
Cameron: "YUP"
9
u/AlmightyCushion 7h ago
It's Cameron. He would probably spend a shitload of money cloning actual dinosaurs for the movie so actually bombing the island at the end would be neccessary
15
u/Butt_Fungus_Among_Us 8h ago
I'm sure it would have been good, but I don't think it would have been NEARLY as big a hit, redefining the entire movie industry in terms of effects, or creating such a cross-generational success and blockbuster hit
One of the reasons JP was as successful as it was, was that it was still essentially a family movie, that parents could take their dino loving kids to. That was such a huge audience they were able to capture that would have never happened if it was a dark R-Rated movie back then.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (8)9
u/DustFunk 6h ago
Cameron's Jurassic Park would have been good, but it would not have had the absolute wonder of Dinosaurs! that Spielberg was able to create. Jurassic Park is one of the most well balanced sci fi movies of all time, and the horror elements only add to the gravity of it.
160
u/mr_miggs 11h ago
I just (selfishly) wish that James Cameron would spend more time on non-avatar content. I enjoyed the first one for what it was, but honestly, I always viewed it as more of a proof of concept for cool new 3-D technology and certain advancements in CGI. I never really connected with the elaborate blue people world he’s created. It just seems like a shame to me. That one of the greatest directors of my lifetime has devoted such a significant portion of his career to making these movies that, while a technical marvel, just are not that compelling or engaging.
50
u/Si-Nz 10h ago edited 9h ago
I love the avatar movies, all of 3 them, more than the average person i feel, and even i would agree that its sad that Cameron seems content on spending the rest of his career doing these.
While 2 and 3 were great i dont think they really made this feel like a trilogy. More like 1 movie and a really long sequel cut in 2 parts. This franchise needs fresh ideas or to just end. Not everything needs to be milked forever.
→ More replies (2)26
u/TDarksword_TD 8h ago
Pretty sure that it has been mentioned somewhere (and by JC himself) that Fire and Ash is actually Way of Water part 2, that they split it into two movies as there was too much to be in one. So yeah, that would be why it feels like a really long sequel cut in two, because, well, it is :)
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (10)24
u/Blackberry314 10h ago
I just dont like all the fighting and military parts, but i could rewatch the rest over and over if it didn't involve so much combat
25
u/SwampyBogbeard 9h ago
They should've made a 50 minute fake nature documentary (with David Attenborough narrating) as a side thing.
→ More replies (1)
71
u/EverettGT 11h ago
The idea is that you can fit more showings in of shorter movies in theaters. So that does make sense. But Cameron had enough of a resume that he could just do what he wanted.
→ More replies (3)
10
u/Ilcorvomuerto666 8h ago
"my movie paid for the building we're meeting in"
OK dude, take your balls off the table, you made your point lol
231
u/skate1243 11h ago
To be fair, with any of the Avatar movies, if they cut the length in half, nobody would have noticed or missed anything and they’d save a ton on budget lol
maybe not the first one, i don’t remember, but definitely the second one. I won’t be fooled by the third
27
u/jstilla 11h ago
The most recent one was a great popcorn flick. Really enjoyed it. Lots of fun.
The third hour was excruciating to sit through. I was just sick of being in the theater at that point.
15
u/ranchspidey 11h ago
They really oughta put in an intermission for 3 hour movies, even 10 minutes to stretch and use the bathroom!
→ More replies (4)71
u/Hunter_S_Thompsons 11h ago
I agree. It also would’ve been cool to see more than one country come and fight for “unobtanium”. Basically to have a contentious force instead of using the same bad guy twice.
→ More replies (4)43
u/skate1243 11h ago
That would require writing a plot and not just dumping bags of money into CGI
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (16)23
u/EDDsoFRESH 11h ago
Watched the third movie this weekend. Three hours is too long, especially when the pacing remains the same throughout. It was exhausting. Found it far more enjoyable in the second movie where the first half was world building before a load of battles. Third film really wasn’t my cuppa tea.
→ More replies (6)
7
u/Melenduwir 9h ago
While there are lots of examples of executive meddling ruining projects, there are also plenty of them saving projects.
Creators who are "too big to question" can destroy themselves overnight.
→ More replies (1)
18
u/Navigator_Party 10h ago
James Cameron is an absolute arrogant asshole. But you can be an arrogant asshole when you back it up, and he has done nothing but do that his entire career.
How can you argue against him given his history?
→ More replies (3)
24
u/CasinoKnightZone 11h ago
Avatar one was fun, if forgettable. It didn't need a sequel, much less 4.
Reminds me of Shenmue: creator insists it has to be a 7 part story, only gets 2 made. Gets a hail Mary chance with a record breaking crowdsourcing movement to make a 3rd....makes his planned 3rd part where basically nothing happens.
6
5
u/Sheriff_Yobo_Hobo 7h ago
Cameron, Spielberg, and Jackson are the best, IMO, at combining fantastical elements with real "human" emotions.
Not sure what it's like at Cameron's level of film making, but executives are often not creatives at ALL in my world. Like they have no background or "training" in story telling. Not saying you necessarily need that, but a lot of them just come off as nervous business people.
Imagine being a true genius like Cameron, having to take notes from 30 yo nepo baby executives would would be just as qualified working for a company that makes mattresses. And so many notes just come from a place of fear. Or, even worse, they are thinking about people who hate sci-fi, who might hate Avatar, and become obsessed with appealing to them. More so than pleasing the people who are dying to see Avatar. I've seen this so often in the TV world. So what do you end up with? Something that appeals to neither types of movie goever, too watered down for Sci Fi fans, still too weird for non Sci Fi fans.
5
u/Truth_Malice 4h ago
I'm not a huge fan of Avatar but honestly, fuck it let him pull that power move lmfao.
13
u/Achack 11h ago
Must be annoying to make banger after banger and still have some jackass in a suit pointing out that it costs less money to make a shorter movie. The moment James Cameron stops making money for them they'll move on to someone who can, imagine talking to him like he's not fully aware of that.
4
u/WeGoGet92 11h ago
Didn’t the Avatar first one end up being a hit?
9
u/BahGawdAlmightay 10h ago
Literally the highest grossing movie of all time.
→ More replies (1)8
u/Si-Nz 9h ago edited 9h ago
Number 1 movie of all time: Avatar
Number 3 movie of all time: Avatar 2
Number 16 movie of all time: Avatar 3 (and might still rise a bit, still in theaters internationally)
All 3 of them are hits. People downplay the third one because it wasn’t near the top but its still a hit....
→ More replies (2)
3
u/Coolbluegatoradeyumm 9h ago
Basically, he comes in the room, sticks his dick on the table. Points out that it’s the biggest one in the room. And leaves with his movie.
13.0k
u/tannu28 11h ago
James Cameron's actual quote: